Technical SEO in Atlanta for the problems you cannot see

A full crawl checked against your log files and Search Console, a render comparison, Core Web Vitals from field data, an internal link and architecture review, and a structured data validation pass. You get every issue scored on impact against effort, written as tickets your developers can pick up.

Yes. We implement and validate schema for the entity types your pages actually represent, and monitor for the errors Google reports weeks later. We do not add markup for things a page is not, which is the fastest way to lose rich result eligibility.

Yes. Migration work means redirect map design before launch, not a rescue afterwards. We map every URL, define the redirect rules, test them on staging, then monitor indexation and rankings daily through the first weeks post-launch.

Yes. Large catalogues are where technical work pays most, because crawl budget and template-level issues multiply across thousands of URLs. Log file analysis matters much more at that scale, and it is part of the audit rather than an add-on.

It depends entirely on what is slow. A render-blocking script or unsized images is a day of work; a heavy JavaScript framework rebuilding on every interaction is a project. The audit tells you which you have before anyone quotes you.

Interaction to Next Paint replaced First Input Delay as a Core Web Vitals metric in March 2024. It measures how long the page takes to visually respond to a click or tap across the whole visit, not just the first interaction — so heavy JavaScript that was invisible under FID now shows up clearly.

Two to three weeks for the audit itself on most sites, longer for large catalogues where log analysis matters. Implementation depends on your development cycle; we usually ship the highest-impact fixes inside the first month.

We implement wherever we have access, and write developer-ready tickets where we do not. A report you cannot act on is not a deliverable.

Indexed is the floor, not the goal. The questions that follow are whether the right pages are indexed, whether crawl budget is being spent on them, whether they render completely, and whether the internal link graph sends authority anywhere useful. Those are usually where the ceiling is.

Directly, it is a modest signal and it will not rescue weak content. Indirectly, it moves conversion and engagement, and it removes an excuse Google has to prefer a competitor when everything else is close. We treat it as a tiebreaker worth winning, not a silver bullet.